Black-Letter Methodology in Public Health Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70280/njph(2024)v1i1.18Keywords:
Black letter methodology, doctrinal research, public health, legal determinants of health, Nepal, HealthAbstract
In comparison to other public health disciplines, such as epidemiology and social sciences, the significance of law in promoting population-level health advances is relatively underutilized and less well-studied. Black-letter methodology, also known as doctrinal research, traditionally used in legal studies, focuses on the systematic analysis of legal texts and statutes. Black-letter methodology indicates the fundamental components of legal study that are not subject to dispute or uncertainty. It is generally recognized by the majority of justices in a specific jurisdiction. The fundamental sources of law, such as legislation, are the focus of the black-letter analysis. In public health, the objective of black-letter methodology is to acquire an understanding of the ways in which the legal determinants, including various laws, procedures, systems, and provisions, affect the health of the people involved. This methodology can be adapted to public health research to examine the impact of laws and regulations on health outcomes. This viewpoint explores the application of the black-letter methodology in public health, highlighting its potential to provide robust insights into the legal determinants of health.
References
1. Academic Programs | CDPH-TU [Internet]. Cdphtu.edu.np. 2020 [cited 2024 Aug 15]. Available from: https://cdphtu.edu.np/courses
2. Nelson B. The Depiction of Unwritten Law. 2016.
3. Legrand P. Jameses at play: a tractation on the comparison of laws. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 2017 Jul 1;65(suppl_1):1-32.
4. Archive, V. (n.d.). Doctrinal Legal Research – Jusfocus Research Institute. Retrieved from http://jusfocus.com/doctrinal-legal-research/
5. Blackletter law [Internet]. LII / Legal Information Institute. 2020 [cited 2024 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/blackletter_law#
6. McConville M. Research Methods for Law. Edinburgh University Press; 2017.
7. Canuel ET. Comparative Commercial Law: Methodologies, Black Letter Law and Law-in-Action. NJCL. 2012:ii.
8. Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL, AMA Manual of Style Committee. Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. Jama. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):621-7.
9. Kilcommins S. Doctrinal legal method (Black Letterism): assumptions, commitments and shortcomings.
10. Rakotovao L, Simeoni M, Bennett-AbuAyyash C, Walji T, Abdi S. Addressing anti-Black racism within public health in North America: a scoping review. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2024 Jun 28;23(1):128.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arjun Aryal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Nepal Journal of Public Health (NJPH) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. This license allows others to:
- Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: Appropriate credit must be given, a link to the license must be provided, and any changes made must be indicated. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
For more details about the license, please visit the Creative Commons website.



